Total Questions: 150
Total Marks: 150
Total Duration: 120 minutes
Negative Marking: No Negative Marking
Section 1: Legal Aptitude and Legal Reasoning
No. of Questions: 30
MHCET-Law for admission to the 3-year LLB courses consisted of only principle based questions in the Legal section. Major test areas covered in this section were Crime, Torts, Contracts. Just as in the MHCET Law entrance for 5 Year LLB admissions, all questions were principle based and no questions were asked based on legal knowledge. Questions on Constitution were not asked just as in the paper for 5-year LLB. Principles from torts, crime and contracts dominated the section. Overall, a good number of genuine attempts would be 24 + out of 30. And a score of 22 would be considered a good score. Time to be devoted to the section should be around 30 to 35 minutes as the principle-based questions increased the length of attempts.
Section 2: General Knowledge
No. of Questions: 40
Questions on the GK section were almost equally divided into current affair and static knowledge. Current affairs questions about G20 summit, satellite launches, government yojanas, etc were asked as expected. Questions about rivers and tributaries, dams and rivers, monuments and states, World Wildlife Fund – were also asked. Overall, there were no major surprises in this section. A well prepared student would manage a good score of 30 + out of 40.
Section 3: Logical and Analytical Reasoning
No. of Questions: 30
The reasoning again leaned heavily towards arrangements and puzzles with almost 20 questions from that topic. 4 sets of arrangements & puzzles were asked. Most of these questions were of a moderate level difficulty but took up a lot of time which is a precious commodity in any entrance test. The topic of syllogisms contributed five questions all of which were relatively easy. Both 3-statement and 2-statement syllogisms were asked. five questions from blood relations were asked. Statement – assumptions, statement – conclusions, arguments and assertions, which are generally staples in such exams, were surprisingly amiss in the section. Neither coding-decoding nor series were asked. A good number of genuine attempts for this section would be 25 and a good score of 21+ out of 30 in 30 minutes can be attained.
Section 4: Verbal Ability (English)
No. of Questions: 50
Reading Comprehension dominated the verbal ability section with 2 lengthy passages being asked with topics ranging from status of universities to patents and innovations. Ten questions each were asked from each passage with two questions on synonyms and two antonyms. Five questions were asked on para-jumbles with one para-jumble to be solved and all five questions to be answered on the basis of that one para-jumble. Ten questions of Cloze test were asked. Almost ten questions on grammar were asked in Spotting the Error format. The section was relatively easy. A well prepared student should be able to make at least 42+ genuine attempts in this section with close to 40 correct attempts in 25 minutes.
In overall analysis, MHCET LAW (3 years) was a balanced paper along expected lines. Level of difficulty in all sections was again at par with our mock tests. Again principle based questions dominated the section and vocabulary questions were very less.
Note: As there was no negative marking, lot of students would have attempted all questions. The suggested good attempt and good score are the net genuine attempts and score obtained from it.
|Section||Number of Questions||Suggested Time (In Minutes)||Difficulty Level||Good Attempts||Good Score|
|Legal Aptitude||30||35||Easy||24 +||22 +|
|General Knowledge & Current Affairs||40||10 to 12||Moderate||34 +||30 +|
|Logical Reasoning||30||35||Moderate (but lengthy)||24||21 +|
|English & Comprehension||50||35 to 40||Easy (but lengthy)||42 +||40 +|
|Total||150||120||Easy to Moderate||124 +||113 +|
Recommended for you
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp IPMAT 2019 Exam Analysis- IIM Rohtak Overview of IPMAT 2019 for IIM Rohtak: Total Questions: 120 | Duration: 120 minutes | Marking: …
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp CLAT 2019 Exam Analysis Overview of CLAT 2019: Total Questions: 200 | Total Duration: 120 minutes | Marking: +1 for Correct answer and – 0.25 for Incorrect answer …
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp CHRIST BBA Entrance Test Analysis – 2018 Total Questions: 120 Total Marks: 120 Total Duration: 120 minutes (No sectional Time …
MAH Law CET (5-Year Law Program) – 2018: Exam Analysis Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes (No sectional Time Limit) Marking System Marking: +1 for Correct, No Negative Marking Paper Pattern …
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp CMAT 2018 Exam Analysis: Afternoon Slot Quantitative Techniques and Data Interpretation (25 Questions): Slot 2 had 3 questions from Data …
Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Legal Aptitude and Legal Reasoning No. of Questions: 40 The legal section of MHCET LAW was pretty comfortably …
Exam Analysis: CLAT 2017 Total Questions: 200 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: 1/4th or – 0.25 Elementary Mathematics Total questions: 20 Quantitative section was dominated by Arithmetic based questions, especially Time & Work (4 questions) …
Exam Analysis: NPAT 2017 Total Questions: 120 Total Duration: 120 minutes No Negative Marking Section 1: Quantitative and Numerical Ability No. of Questions: 40 Time Allotted: 45 Minutes When it was clearly known to students …
Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 150 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Quantitative Ability No. of Questions: 40 The section had questions dominated by Arithmetic. Questions ranged from topics like …
Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 150 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Logical Reasoning No. of Questions: 30 This sections had some good quality and tough questions on Cause-Effect, Statement …
A genuine roller coaster ride: Three years, three papers. Cutoff for IIFT’13 was around 48.3 Cutoff for IIFT’14 was a little less than 38.5 Cutoff for IIFT’15 seems to be around 50 IIFT’15 was an …
Name of Exam: Maharashtra Common Entrance Test (MHCET-2016) for MMS/MBA/PGDM Exam Date: 12th and 13th March 2016 Other Details: 200 Questions 200 Marks (1 mark for correct and No negative markings) 5 options Computer-Based Linear …
SET 2016 ( BBA, BSc, BA, BMS, BCA) Exam Complete Analysis Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Quantitative Ability No. of Questions: 40 This section was more or less like last …
Total Questions:130 Total Marks:130 Total Duration:120 minutes Negative Marking: 0.25 marks Section1: Quantitative Ability No. of Questions: 30 This was supposed to be moderate section for a well prepared student. Like last year this year …
Total Questions: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: 1/4th of allotted marks Section 1: Proficiency in English Language No. of Questions: 50 It seems this season is favouring students who have good command over …
Analysis of NMAT 2016-17 Other Examinations like to be Unpredictable. NMAT likes to be Standardized. NMAT has once again maintained its format and difficulty level (except for a couple of minor tweaks) same as the …
One Sentence Analysis: “Quant and DI Questions were even more time consuming than what they were expected to be.” Section-wise detailed Analysis is as follows: Quantitative Ability & Data Interpretation (48 Questions, 60 Minutes): This …
- NMAT 2019 Exam Analysis October 4, 2019
- Fact File | ICFAI Business School | 2019 September 27, 2019
- Benchmark Your Preparation With Online Mock CET September 10, 2019
- Strategy To Crack CAT Online Exam In The First Attempt September 8, 2019
- Endeavor’s BBA Online Course – The Easiest & Fastest Way To Prepare For BBA Entrances September 8, 2019