A single line summary of CAT2016 – format same as CAT2015 with difficulty level a notch higher.
CAT 2016 had 3 sections:
- Verbal Ability – Verbal Ability (10 questions) & Reading Comprehension (24 questions)
- Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning – Data Interpretation (20 questions) & Logical Reasoning (12 questions)
- Quantitative Ability had 34 questions
The sectional, in depth analysis is as follows:
The paper was in this order – Verbal Ability first, Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning second, Quantitative Aptitude third.
As usual, Vocabulary based, Grammar based, Logical Continuation & Critical Reasoning questions missing.
- RCs were 24 in number out of the 34 questions. RCs were 5 in numbers – 3 RCs with 6 questions each & 2 RCs with 3 questions each. However, this subsection can’t be called difficult. Out of the 24 questions, 15 questions were direct and hence these questions called for a lot of regression. Apart from that, 4-5 other questions were of the format “Author would agree to all of the below EXCEPT” which again led to back & forth reading of the passages. All in all, the RCs in terms of intensity of language / density or depth of the topic were light but slightly time consuming because of the regression it called for.
- Verbal Ability had just 3 types of questions: Logical Discontinuity / Out of Context question (3 in number), Summary of the passage (3 in number) & Parajumbles (4 in number). All the questions in this subsection were of the “key-in” or “non-MCQ” variety. The problem with this being non-MCQ is that the parajumbles became difficult because each of the parajumbles had 5 sentences to be rearranged. Links were available, but two broken links and hence it make this part a little tricky. However, a cheeky CAT taker will take the shots because these fall under the “non-negative marking” category. Summary and Out of Context were non-MCQ variety but this can be called “pseudo non-MCQ” because it was more like keying-in a number instead of marking an option.
- All in all, the section was Easy to Moderate to navigate.
- 27-28 attempts with 90% accuracy can be classified as a good score in this section.
- Challenging section – Could be the final Decider, again.
- The paper had 8 sets of 4 questions each. Total of 32 questions.
- The sets based on – The girls buying the T-shirts, the 2 section paper with different marking scheme was easy. However, even in these 2 sets all the questions weren’t solvable. Apart from these 2 sets, others were time consuming and because each of the questions demanded a separate data to work on, the whole process turned tricky. The test taker had to read the data, arrange the same, solve selected questions and let go of 1 or 2 questions per set.
- This section was surely the decider with 5 DI sets and 3 LR sets and nearly all the sets were time consuming.
- 15 attempts with 80% accuracy can be classified as a good score in this section.
QA Section :
- Standard – is the word! Be it the spread or the difficulty level, it was as the doctor prescribed.
- Nearly every chapter had a representative there. Percentages, Profit & Loss, Linear Equations, Quadratic Equations, Inequalities, Surds & Indices, Averages & Partnership, Numbers, Time & Work, Time & Distance, Alligations & Mixtures, Permutation & Combination, Inequalities, Triangles, Polygons, Circles, Area & Volume, Coordinate Geometry and the list goes on. With around a third of the section difficult, a third easy and a third moderate, the spread of the questions was really good.
- Such a section has advantages as well as disadvantages – you should have been prepared with everything and just in case you have left just a chapter or two, the damage isn’t astounding. Hence, a cheer-worthy paper for a prepared test taker.
- 25 attempts with 85% accuracy can be classified as a good score in this section.
The softer aspect is that, in case the LRDI section broke the back of a well prepared student, his performance in the 3rd section would get affected.
- All in all, an aspirant with 47 net correct questions will be able to score around 99%ile.
- An aspirant with 36 net correct questions should be in the 95%ile range.
- An aspirant with 31 net correct questions should be in the 90%ile range.
- An aspirant with 25 net correct questions should be in the 80%ile range.
- An aspirant with 21 net correct questions should be in the 70%ile range.
Best wishes for the results.
The author Parasharan Chari is an alumnus of SP Jain and is currently serving as the Chief Operating Officer at Endeavor Careers and is also associated with the design and development of its online testing portal
Recommended for you
CLAT exam 2021 was conducted on July 23, 2021, via pen and paper method. In this CLAT 2021 analysis, our experts provide in-depth analysis and a breakdown of the test. A total of 70,277 students …
MAH Law CET (5-Year Law Program) – 2018: Exam Analysis Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes (No sectional Time Limit) Marking System Marking: +1 for Correct, No Negative Marking Paper Pattern …
A genuine roller coaster ride: Three years, three papers. Cutoff for IIFT’13 was around 48.3 Cutoff for IIFT’14 was a little less than 38.5 Cutoff for IIFT’15 seems to be around 50 IIFT’15 was an …
Check out the SNAP 2020 Exam Analysis here: https://endeavorcareers.comsnap-2020-exam-analysis SNAP 2015 Exam Analysis Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 180 Total time: 120 minutes Innovative…Fast Moving…Difficult are the words that can describe SNAP this year. Although …
Analysis of NMAT 2016-17 Other Examinations like to be Unpredictable. NMAT likes to be Standardized. NMAT has once again maintained its format and difficulty level (except for a couple of minor tweaks) same as the …
- Endeavor Careers Choicest Blogs: Weekly Current Affairs: July 2022, Week 01 July 4, 2022
- IPMAT 2022 Exam Analysis – IIM Indore July 2, 2022
- GK Capsule May 2022 June 28, 2022
- Endeavor Careers Choicest Blogs: Weekly Current Affairs: June 2022, Week 04 June 27, 2022
- IPMAT 2022 Exam Analysis – IIM Rohtak June 25, 2022