One lakh done. One lakh to go. Online CAT of this scale is unprecedented. I should say – Good job TCS – for having finished this humongous task of 2 lakh takers in a day!
The day started with regular anxious faces outside the center with stray incidents of aspirants not carrying the right ID cards, but all in all, a well managed setup – be it people, infrastructure or time management.
The cosmetic build-up observations:
- There was no demo or practice screen given before the test (First time since CAT moved online). There was a “demo test” uploaded on their official website and the same screen was there on the test day. So, we can safely say, 15 mins of aspirants’ anxiety neutralized by doing this. Good job!
- As far as instructions for Reading Comprehension is concerned, it was an Abbas Mustan movie as the data on “Instructions on CAT website Vs. CAT demo Vs. Instructions on actual CAT day Vs. Actual CAT” was inconsistent.
- Instructions on CAT website – said RC will have 3 / 6 questions
- CAT demo – said RC will have 3 / 6 questions
- Instructions on actual CAT day – said RC will have 4 questions
- Actual CAT – had 3 / 6 questions
- There was a slight variation in the way the CAT test screen looked – The demo had 3 sections in it with no subsequent subsections.
- The actual CAT had 5 subsections:
- Verbal Ability had 2 subsections – Verbal Ability (10 questions) & Reading Comprehension (24 questions)
- Data Interpretation & Logical Reasoning had 2 subsections – Data Interpretation (16 questions) & Logical Reasoning (16 questions)
- Quantitative Ability had just one section with 34 questions
- This was however easier to navigate and hence I am sure the aspirants won’t complain.
Now the sectional analysis:
The paper was in the prescribed order – Verbal Ability first, DI & AR second, QA third.
1. Verbal Ability & RC Section:
- Easy but path-breaking. Vocabulary missing. Grammar missing. Logical Continuation missing. Critical Reasoning missing.
- RCs had an unprecedented weightage in this year’s CAT with RCs spanning 24 out of 34 questions. RCs were 5 in number – 3 RCs with 6 questions each & 2 RCs with 3 questions each. However, this subsection can’t be called difficult. 3 out of the 4 RCs (6 + 6 + 6) were dominated by direct questions whereas the 2 RCs with 3 questions each had some indirect, implied idea questions. The number of words in these RCs spanned from 300 words to 600 words. The RCs in terms of intensity of language / density or depth of the topic were light and hence not as time consuming as were the previous versions.
- Verbal Ability had just 3 types of questions: Logical Discontinuity / Out of Context question (3 in number), Summary of the passage (3 in number) & Parajumbles (4 in number). All the questions in this subsection were of the “key-in” or “non-MCQ” variety. The problem with this being non-MCQ is that the parajumbles became difficult because each of the parajumbles had 5 sentences to be rearranged. Links were available, but two broken links and hence it make this part a little tricky. However, a cheeky CAT taker will take the shots because these fall under the “non-negative marking” category. Summary and Out of Context were non-MCQ variety but this can be called “pseudo non-MCQ” because it was more like keying-in a number instead of marking an option.
- The shockers were that there was not a single question on Grammar (neither Sentence Correction nor Error Detection) and there wasn’t a single question based on Vocabulary (neither Fill in the blanks nor analogies / word usages / phrasal verbs etc.)
- All in all, the section was Easy to Moderate to navigate.
- 27-28 attempts with 90% accuracy can be classified as a good score in this section.
2. Logical Reasoning & Data Interpretation Section:
- Challenging section – Could be the final Decider.
- The paper had 8 sets of 4 questions each. Total of 32 questions.
- The easy, moderate and difficult sets were well distributed and well placed.
- The sets based on – Tourist travel data (quarter wise), Time and Work based (Job A, Job B, Job C), Installed Capacity of 10 projects can be classified as easy and those sets which a well prepared CAT test taker will harp on.
- The sets on cube arrangement, newspaper distribution & laptop distribution were tricky and needed a little more patience than the sets mentioned above.
- The other 2 sets were time consuming and surely were time bombs. Not worth investing time and energy and that too on the day of CAT.
- All in all, for the fact that verbal as well as quant was on the easy to moderate side, LRDI section can be safely called the decider.
- 20 attempts with 85% accuracy can be classified as a good score in this section.
3. Quantitative Aptitude Section :
- Standard & clinical! Period.
- Nearly every chapter had a representative there. Percentages, Profit & Loss, Linear Equations, Quadratic Equations, Functions, Inequalities, Surds & Indices, Averages & Partnership, Numbers… huh.. The list doesn’t end there.. Time & Word, Time & Distance, Alligations & Mixtures, Permutation & Combination… the list still doesn’t end.. Functions, Inequalities, Triangles, Polygons, Circles, Area & Volume, Heights & Distances, Coordinate Geometry and the list goes on. This seemed like a fresh MBA’s assignment – “He googled the preparation curriculum for CAT, followed the index and put in a representative from each chapter that came his way”. So, it was a good job done!
- Such a paper has advantages as well as disadvantages – you should have been prepared with everything and just in case you have left just a chapter or two, the damage isn’t astounding. Hence, a cheer-worthy paper for a prepared test taker.
- All in all out of the 34 questions,16-18 questions were easy(for a well prepared test taker each such question will get solved in less than 1.5 minutes),8-10 questions were reasonably time consuming and would have demanded 3-4 minutes for solving the same and 5-6 questions(1 question on Set Theory,1 question on Mensuration,1 question on Number system,1 question on Functions,1 question on Inequalities and 1 question on Quadratic Equations were time consuming and it would have been wise to let these questions go).
- 27 attempts with 90% accuracy can be classified as a good score in this section.
The softer aspect is that, in case the LRDI section broke the back of a well prepared student, his performance in the 3rd section would get affected.
All in all, 60 genuine attempts (genuine word has been used because nothing can discount the presence of those cheeky calculative aspirants who will take a shot at all key-in variety questions just because it doesn’t have a negative marking in it) with 85% accuracy can be classified as a good score. Good score for us would mean crossing 98 percentile.
Best wishes for the results.
Recommended for you
CLAT exam 2021 was conducted on July 23, 2021, via pen and paper method. In this CLAT 2021 analysis, our experts provide in-depth analysis and a breakdown of the test. A total of 70,277 students … Continue reading “CLAT 2021 Exam Analysis: Expert Review and Cut-Off”
Overview of SLAT 2020 Analysis – Day 1, 2, & 3 This year, due to Covid-19, most of the exams have changed their paper pattern and SLAT was no different. This time it was an … Continue reading “SLAT 2020 Exam Analysis – Day 1, 2, and 3”
Click to check out IPMAT 2020 IIM Indore Analysis Overview of IPMAT 2020 for IIM Rohtak: The IPMAT 2020 exam for admission to the five-year Integrated Programme in Management (IPM) of IIM Rohtak was finally … Continue reading “IPMAT 2020 Exam Analysis- IIM Rohtak”
NPAT 2020 Analysis Day 3 (28th June) Total Questions: 120 | Total Marks: 120 | Total Duration: 100 minutes Marking System: +1 for Correct, No Negative Marking NPAT 2020 Exam Paper Pattern Sr Number Section … Continue reading “NPAT 2020 Exam Analysis – Day 3”
NPAT 2020 Analysis Day 2 (27th June) Total Questions: 120 | Total Marks: 120 | Total Duration: 100 minutes Marking System: +1 for Correct, No Negative Marking NPAT 2020 Exam Paper Pattern Sr Number Section … Continue reading “NPAT 2020 Exam Analysis – Day 2”
CMAT 2020 Exam Analysis Overall, CMAT 2020 Exam was similar to CMAT 2019 difficulty-wise. Few surprises were located in the Quantitative Technique and Language Comprehension Section, whereas Logical Reasoning and General Awareness were fairly in … Continue reading “CMAT 2020 Exam Analysis”
CAT 2019 Exam Analysis Slot 2 It has been interesting to observe the changing hues and colours of CAT over the last few years. The 100 questions, 3 sections CAT started first by taking DI/LR … Continue reading “CAT 2019 Exam Analysis – Slot 2”
Check out the first impression of CAT 2019 Exam Analysis below, followed by detailed sectional analysis and cut-offs for CAT 2019. CAT 2019 Exam Video Analysis – Slot 1 CAT 2019 Exam Analysis – Slot … Continue reading “CAT 2019 Exam Analysis – Slot 1”
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp CLAT 2019 Exam Analysis Overview of CLAT 2019: Total Questions: 200 | Total Duration: 120 minutes | Marking: +1 for Correct answer and – 0.25 for Incorrect answer … Continue reading “CLAT 2019 Exam Analysis”
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp View IPMAT 2020 Exam Analysis here IPMAT 2020 Exam Analysis- IIM Rohtak IPMAT 2019 Exam Analysis- IIM Rohtak … Continue reading “IPMAT 2019 Exam Analysis – IIM Rohtak”
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp IIFT 2018 Exam Analysis If IIFT 2017 shocked the test taker by producing the most difficult test of recent past, … Continue reading “IIFT 2018 Exam Analysis and Expected Cut-off”
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp CHRIST BBA Entrance Test Analysis – 2018 Total Questions: 120 Total Marks: 120 Total Duration: 120 minutes (No sectional Time … Continue reading “CHRIST BBA Entrance Test Analysis – 2018”
MAH Law CET (5-Year Law Program) – 2018: Exam Analysis Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes (No sectional Time Limit) Marking System Marking: +1 for Correct, No Negative Marking Paper Pattern … Continue reading “MAH Law CET (5 Year Program) – 2018: Exam Analysis”
Here’s a faster and easier way to stay updated – Subscribe to Endeavor on Whatsapp CMAT 2018 Exam Analysis: Afternoon Slot Quantitative Techniques and Data Interpretation (25 Questions): Slot 2 had 3 questions from Data … Continue reading “CMAT 2018 Exam Analysis: Afternoon Slot”
CMAT 2018 Exam Analysis: Morning Slot Structure of CMAT 2018 was as per the CMAT standards with 25 questions in each of the four sections. Aspirants had 3 hours to attempt the test paper. Section … Continue reading “CMAT 2018 Exam Analysis: Morning Slot”
(For video analysis please scroll to the bottom) CAT 2017 had 3 sections as mentioned in CAT Notification and Online Demo: As per the format, the first section was Reading Comprehension and Verbal Ability. The … Continue reading “CAT 2017 Exam Analysis | Second Slot”
Detailed Analysis is followed after the video CAT 2017 had 3 sections as mentioned in CAT Notification and Online Demo: As per the format, first section was Reading Comprehension and Verbal Ability. Break up of … Continue reading “CAT 2017 Exam Analysis | First Slot”
As standardized as it could be!! Question type and difficulty level both were same as that of last year’s exam. It was, once again, a speed based test inviting all aspirants to target a typical … Continue reading “NMAT 2017 Exam Analysis: Window 1 Slot 1”
Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Legal Aptitude and Legal Reasoning No. of Questions: 30 MHCET-Law for admission to the 3-year LLB courses consisted … Continue reading “Exam Analysis: MHCET LAW (3 years)”
Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Legal Aptitude and Legal Reasoning No. of Questions: 40 The legal section of MHCET LAW was pretty comfortably … Continue reading “Exam Analysis: MHCET LAW (5 years)”
Exam Analysis: CLAT 2017 Total Questions: 200 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: 1/4th or – 0.25 Elementary Mathematics Total questions: 20 Quantitative section was dominated by Arithmetic based questions, especially Time & Work (4 questions) … Continue reading “Exam Analysis: CLAT 2017”
Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 150 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Quantitative Ability No. of Questions: 40 The section had questions dominated by Arithmetic. Questions ranged from topics like … Continue reading “Exam Analysis: SET General (BBA) 2017”
Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 150 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Logical Reasoning No. of Questions: 30 This sections had some good quality and tough questions on Cause-Effect, Statement … Continue reading “Exam Analysis: SET LAW 2017”
A genuine roller coaster ride: Three years, three papers. Cutoff for IIFT’13 was around 48.3 Cutoff for IIFT’14 was a little less than 38.5 Cutoff for IIFT’15 seems to be around 50 IIFT’15 was an … Continue reading “Analysis of IIFT’15: Speed, Selection, Strategy…Cutoff!”
SET 2016 ( BBA, BSc, BA, BMS, BCA) Exam Complete Analysis Total Questions: 150 Total Marks: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: No Negative Marking Section 1: Quantitative Ability No. of Questions: 40 This section was more or less like last … Continue reading “SET 2016 – Common – Analysis”
Total questions: 200 Total marks: 200 Total duration: 120 minutes Negative marking: 1/4th or – 0.25 It always feels good to be back to normal. CLAT 2016 just did a “Ghar Wapsi” by toning down … Continue reading “CLAT 2016 Exam Analysis & Expected Cut-Off”
Total Questions: 150 Total Duration: 120 minutes Negative Marking: 1/4th of allotted marks Section 1: Proficiency in English Language No. of Questions: 50 It seems this season is favouring students who have good command over … Continue reading “NMIMS – NPAT 2016 Exam Analysis”
Analysis of NMAT 2016-17 Other Examinations like to be Unpredictable. NMAT likes to be Standardized. NMAT has once again maintained its format and difficulty level (except for a couple of minor tweaks) same as the … Continue reading “Analysis of NMAT 2016-17: Window 1 – Day 1 – Slot 1”
Analysis of NMAT 2016-17: Window 3 – Day 1 A 2 hours exam that feels like 20 minutes….. It’s fast, easy and witty. That’s what NMAT is… NMAT with its standardized format continues the similar … Continue reading “Analysis of NMAT 2016-17: Window 3 – Day 1”
One Sentence Analysis: “Quant and DI Questions were even more time consuming than what they were expected to be.” Section-wise detailed Analysis is as follows: Quantitative Ability & Data Interpretation (48 Questions, 60 Minutes): This … Continue reading “NMAT Window 4, Day 1 Analysis”
Structure of CMAT 2017 was as per the CMAT standards with 25 questions in each of the four sections. Aspirants had 3 hours to attempt the test paper. Unlike last year, CMAT was conducted in … Continue reading “CMAT 2017 Overall Exam Analysis”